uStreamer vs Shinobi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
uStreamer
Lightweight MJPEG streamer for USB and CSI cameras
VS
Shinobi
Open-source NVR and CCTV software for IP cameras
| Feature | uStreamer | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,021 | ★ 4,000 |
| First released | 2018 | 2017 |
| Replaces | mjpg-streamer | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Choose uStreamer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is uStreamer or Shinobi better?
Neither is universally better. Shinobi has the larger community, while uStreamer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are uStreamer and Shinobi free and open-source?
Yes. uStreamer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Shinobi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run uStreamer and Shinobi with Docker?
uStreamer: check the project docs for container support. Shinobi: yes.
Related comparisons
- uStreamer vs WebRTC Camera
- Shinobi vs WebRTC Camera
- uStreamer vs camera-streamer
- uStreamer vs Cameradar
- Shinobi vs Cameradar
- uStreamer vs CompreFace
- Shinobi vs CompreFace
- uStreamer vs Double Take
- Shinobi vs Double Take
- uStreamer vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- Shinobi vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration