WebRTC Camera vs Shinobi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WebRTC Camera
Low-latency camera streaming integration for Home Assistant
VS
Shinobi
Open-source NVR and CCTV software for IP cameras
| Feature | WebRTC Camera | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,161 | ★ 4,000 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Cloud camera streaming | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is WebRTC Camera or Shinobi better?
Neither is universally better. Shinobi has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are WebRTC Camera and Shinobi free and open-source?
Yes. WebRTC Camera is licensed under MIT and Shinobi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WebRTC Camera and Shinobi with Docker?
WebRTC Camera: check the project docs for container support. Shinobi: yes.
Related comparisons
- WebRTC Camera vs Cameradar
- Shinobi vs Cameradar
- WebRTC Camera vs CompreFace
- Shinobi vs CompreFace
- WebRTC Camera vs Double Take
- Shinobi vs Double Take
- WebRTC Camera vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- Shinobi vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- WebRTC Camera vs Frigate Mobile Companion
- Shinobi vs Frigate Mobile Companion