Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Shinobi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Home Assistant Integration
Connects Frigate NVR detections into Home Assistant
VS
Shinobi
Open-source NVR and CCTV software for IP cameras
| Feature | Frigate Home Assistant Integration | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,224 | ★ 4,000 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Cloud camera integrations | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Home Assistant Integration if…
- Tight Home Assistant integration
- Local and private
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Home Assistant Integration or Shinobi better?
Neither is universally better. Shinobi has the larger community, while Frigate Home Assistant Integration is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Frigate Home Assistant Integration and Shinobi free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Home Assistant Integration is licensed under MIT and Shinobi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Home Assistant Integration and Shinobi with Docker?
Frigate Home Assistant Integration: check the project docs for container support. Shinobi: yes.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs WebRTC Camera
- Shinobi vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Cameradar
- Shinobi vs Cameradar
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs CompreFace
- Shinobi vs CompreFace
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Double Take
- Shinobi vs Double Take
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Frigate Mobile Companion
- Shinobi vs Frigate Mobile Companion