CompreFace vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
Frigate Home Assistant Integration
Connects Frigate NVR detections into Home Assistant
| Feature | CompreFace | Frigate Home Assistant Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 1,224 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Cloud camera integrations |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Home Assistant Integration if…
- Tight Home Assistant integration
- Local and private
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or Frigate Home Assistant Integration better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community, while Frigate Home Assistant Integration is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CompreFace and Frigate Home Assistant Integration free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Frigate Home Assistant Integration under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and Frigate Home Assistant Integration with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. Frigate Home Assistant Integration: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- CompreFace vs Agent DVR
- CompreFace vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs WebRTC Camera
- CompreFace vs Bluecherry
- CompreFace vs camera-streamer
- CompreFace vs Cameradar
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Cameradar
- CompreFace vs Camera.UI
- CompreFace vs CodeProject.AI Server
- CompreFace vs datarhei Core