Double Take vs Shinobi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Double Take
Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
VS
Shinobi
Open-source NVR and CCTV software for IP cameras
| Feature | Double Take | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,435 | ★ 4,000 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Double Take or Shinobi better?
Neither is universally better. Shinobi has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Double Take and Shinobi free and open-source?
Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and Shinobi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Double Take and Shinobi with Docker?
Double Take: yes. Shinobi: yes.
Related comparisons
- Double Take vs WebRTC Camera
- Shinobi vs WebRTC Camera
- Double Take vs Cameradar
- Shinobi vs Cameradar
- Double Take vs Camera.UI
- Double Take vs CompreFace
- Shinobi vs CompreFace
- Double Take vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- Double Take vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- Shinobi vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration