CompreFace vs Double Take
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
Double Take
Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
| Feature | CompreFace | Double Take |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 1,435 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or Double Take better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CompreFace and Double Take free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Double Take under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and Double Take with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. Double Take: yes.