SHSelfHostIndex

Camera.UI vs Double Take

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CA Camera.UI Web interface and NVR for RTSP and camera streams VS DO Double Take Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
FeatureCamera.UIDouble Take
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,083★ 1,435
First released20212021
ReplacesNest CamNest Cam

Why pick each one

Choose Camera.UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Camera.UI details

Choose Double Take if…

  • Coordinates several detectors
  • Good Frigate companion
Double Take details

Frequently asked questions

Is Camera.UI or Double Take better?

Neither is universally better. Double Take has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Camera.UI and Double Take free and open-source?

Yes. Camera.UI is licensed under MIT and Double Take under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Camera.UI and Double Take with Docker?

Camera.UI: yes. Double Take: yes.

Related comparisons