Double Take vs Frigate Notify
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Double Take
Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
VS
Frigate Notify
Standalone notification tool for Frigate NVR events
| Feature | Double Take | Frigate Notify |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,435 | ★ 399 |
| First released | 2021 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Notify if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Double Take or Frigate Notify better?
Neither is universally better. Double Take has the larger community, while Frigate Notify is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Double Take and Frigate Notify free and open-source?
Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and Frigate Notify under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Double Take and Frigate Notify with Docker?
Double Take: yes. Frigate Notify: yes.
Related comparisons
- Double Take vs WebRTC Camera
- Double Take vs Cameradar
- Frigate Notify vs Cameradar
- Double Take vs Camera.UI
- Frigate Notify vs Camera.UI
- Double Take vs CompreFace
- Frigate Notify vs CompreFace
- Double Take vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- Frigate Notify vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- Double Take vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration