Double Take vs Frigate Mobile Companion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Double Take
Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
VS
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
| Feature | Double Take | Frigate Mobile Companion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,435 | ★ 5,150 |
| First released | 2021 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Double Take or Frigate Mobile Companion better?
Frigate Mobile Companion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Double Take if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Double Take and Frigate Mobile Companion free and open-source?
Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and Frigate Mobile Companion under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Double Take and Frigate Mobile Companion with Docker?
Double Take: yes. Frigate Mobile Companion: yes.
Related comparisons
- Double Take vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- Double Take vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- Double Take vs Camera.UI
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Camera.UI
- Double Take vs CompreFace
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs CompreFace
- Double Take vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Sighthound Surveillance Station