CompreFace vs Frigate Mobile Companion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
| Feature | CompreFace | Frigate Mobile Companion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 5,150 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or Frigate Mobile Companion better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community, while Frigate Mobile Companion is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CompreFace and Frigate Mobile Companion free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Frigate Mobile Companion under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and Frigate Mobile Companion with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. Frigate Mobile Companion: yes.
Related comparisons
- CompreFace vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- CompreFace vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- CompreFace vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- CompreFace vs camera-streamer
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- CompreFace vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar