Frigate Mobile Companion vs Shinobi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
VS
Shinobi
Open-source NVR and CCTV software for IP cameras
| Feature | Frigate Mobile Companion | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,150 | ★ 4,000 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Wowza | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Mobile Companion or Shinobi better?
Frigate Mobile Companion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Shinobi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Frigate Mobile Companion and Shinobi free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Mobile Companion is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Shinobi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Mobile Companion and Shinobi with Docker?
Frigate Mobile Companion: yes. Shinobi: yes.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- Shinobi vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- Shinobi vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- Shinobi vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Camera.UI