SHSelfHostIndex

WebRTC Camera vs uStreamer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
WE WebRTC Camera Low-latency camera streaming integration for Home Assistant VS US uStreamer Lightweight MJPEG streamer for USB and CSI cameras
FeatureWebRTC CamerauStreamer
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptC
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentsourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 2,161★ 2,021
First released20212018
ReplacesCloud camera streamingmjpg-streamer

Why pick each one

Choose WebRTC Camera if…

  • Very low latency
  • Local and private
WebRTC Camera details

Choose uStreamer if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
uStreamer details

Frequently asked questions

Is WebRTC Camera or uStreamer better?

Neither is universally better. WebRTC Camera has the larger community, while uStreamer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are WebRTC Camera and uStreamer free and open-source?

Yes. WebRTC Camera is licensed under MIT and uStreamer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run WebRTC Camera and uStreamer with Docker?

WebRTC Camera: check the project docs for container support. uStreamer: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons