Cameradar vs uStreamer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cameradar
RTSP stream discovery and access-auditing tool for cameras
VS
uStreamer
Lightweight MJPEG streamer for USB and CSI cameras
| Feature | Cameradar | uStreamer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,147 | ★ 2,021 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Commercial camera audit tools | mjpg-streamer |
Why pick each one
Choose uStreamer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is Cameradar or uStreamer better?
Neither is universally better. Cameradar has the larger community, while uStreamer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cameradar and uStreamer free and open-source?
Yes. Cameradar is licensed under MIT and uStreamer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cameradar and uStreamer with Docker?
Cameradar: yes. uStreamer: check the project docs for container support.