camera-streamer vs uStreamer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurecamera-streameruStreamer
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageCC
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 442★ 2,021
First released20222018
Replacesmjpg-streamermjpg-streamer

Why pick each one

Choose camera-streamer if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
camera-streamer details

Choose uStreamer if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
uStreamer details

Frequently asked questions

Is camera-streamer or uStreamer better?

uStreamer is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider camera-streamer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are camera-streamer and uStreamer free and open-source?

Yes. camera-streamer is licensed under MIT and uStreamer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run camera-streamer and uStreamer with Docker?

camera-streamer: yes. uStreamer: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons