OTOBO vs TicketsBot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted helpdesk & ticketing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOTOBOTicketsBot
CategoryHelpdesk & TicketingHelpdesk & Ticketing
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePerlGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 334★ 26
First released20192018
ReplacesServiceNow, ZendeskZendesk

Why pick each one

Choose OTOBO if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Perl
OTOBO details

Choose TicketsBot if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
TicketsBot details

Frequently asked questions

Is OTOBO or TicketsBot better?

Neither is universally better. OTOBO has the larger community, while TicketsBot is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OTOBO and TicketsBot free and open-source?

Yes. OTOBO is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TicketsBot under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OTOBO and TicketsBot with Docker?

OTOBO: yes. TicketsBot: yes.

Related comparisons