OpenSupports vs Tiledesk

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted helpdesk & ticketing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenSupportsTiledesk
CategoryHelpdesk & TicketingHelpdesk & Ticketing
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptMustache
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 1,038★ 316
First released20162020
ReplacesZendesk, FreshdeskZendesk, Intercom

Why pick each one

Choose OpenSupports if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
OpenSupports details

Choose Tiledesk if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Mustache
Tiledesk details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenSupports or Tiledesk better?

Neither is universally better. OpenSupports has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenSupports and Tiledesk free and open-source?

Yes. OpenSupports is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tiledesk under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenSupports and Tiledesk with Docker?

OpenSupports: yes. Tiledesk: yes.

Related comparisons