ntopng vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturentopngUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageLuaJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 8,069★ 89,960
First released20132021
ReplacesSolarWinds NetFlowPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is ntopng or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ntopng if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are ntopng and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. ntopng is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ntopng and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

ntopng: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons