Glances vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 89,960
First released20122021
ReplacesDatadogPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Uptime Kuma better?

Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Glances and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Glances: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons