Bugsink vs Glances

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBugsinkGlances
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITLGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,983★ 33,269
First released20242012
ReplacesSentry, BugsnagDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Bugsink if…

  • Trivial to self-host
  • Lightweight
Bugsink details

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bugsink or Glances better?

Neither is universally better. Glances has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Bugsink and Glances free and open-source?

Yes. Bugsink is licensed under MIT and Glances under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bugsink and Glances with Docker?

Bugsink: yes. Glances: yes.

Related comparisons