Glances vs Grafana Faro

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesGrafana Faro
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 1,118
First released20122022
ReplacesDatadogSentry, LogRocket

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Grafana Faro if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
Grafana Faro details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Grafana Faro better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana Faro if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and Grafana Faro free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Grafana Faro under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Grafana Faro with Docker?

Glances: yes. Grafana Faro: yes.

Related comparisons