Glances vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesntopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 8,069
First released20122013
ReplacesDatadogSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or ntopng better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ntopng if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and ntopng with Docker?

Glances: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons