Grafana k6 vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Uptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 89,960
First released20172021
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana k6 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana k6 and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons