InfluxDB vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBntopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageRustLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 8,069
First released20132013
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or ntopng better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are InfluxDB and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and ntopng with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons