cAdvisor vs InfluxDB

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecAdvisorInfluxDB
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 19,342★ 31,683
First released20142013
ReplacesDatadogDatadog, AWS Timestream

Why pick each one

Choose cAdvisor if…

  • Zero configuration
  • Lightweight
cAdvisor details

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Frequently asked questions

Is cAdvisor or InfluxDB better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community, while cAdvisor is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are cAdvisor and InfluxDB free and open-source?

Yes. cAdvisor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and InfluxDB under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run cAdvisor and InfluxDB with Docker?

cAdvisor: yes. InfluxDB: yes.

Related comparisons