Glances vs InfluxDB

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesInfluxDB
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 31,683
First released20122013
ReplacesDatadogDatadog, AWS Timestream

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or InfluxDB better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider InfluxDB if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and InfluxDB free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and InfluxDB under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and InfluxDB with Docker?

Glances: yes. InfluxDB: yes.

Related comparisons