Grafana k6 vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6ntopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 8,069
First released20172013
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or ntopng better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana k6 and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and ntopng with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons