cAdvisor vs Grafana k6

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecAdvisorGrafana k6
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 19,342★ 31,211
First released20142017
ReplacesDatadogLoadRunner, BlazeMeter

Why pick each one

Choose cAdvisor if…

  • Zero configuration
  • Lightweight
cAdvisor details

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Frequently asked questions

Is cAdvisor or Grafana k6 better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community, while cAdvisor is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are cAdvisor and Grafana k6 free and open-source?

Yes. cAdvisor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana k6 under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run cAdvisor and Grafana k6 with Docker?

cAdvisor: yes. Grafana k6: yes.

Related comparisons