Cacti vs Grafana k6

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCactiGrafana k6
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, docker, sourcedocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,852★ 31,211
First released20012017
ReplacesPRTG, SolarWindsLoadRunner, BlazeMeter

Why pick each one

Choose Cacti if…

  • Mature and reliable
  • Detailed graph templates
Cacti details

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cacti or Grafana k6 better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cacti and Grafana k6 free and open-source?

Yes. Cacti is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Grafana k6 under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cacti and Grafana k6 with Docker?

Cacti: yes. Grafana k6: yes.

Related comparisons