Cacti vs Grafana

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCactiGrafana
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, docker, sourcedocker, bare-metal, helm
GitHub stars★ 1,852★ 76,153
First released20012014
ReplacesPRTG, SolarWindsDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Cacti if…

  • Mature and reliable
  • Detailed graph templates
Cacti details

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cacti or Grafana better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cacti and Grafana free and open-source?

Yes. Cacti is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Grafana under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cacti and Grafana with Docker?

Cacti: yes. Grafana: yes.

Related comparisons