Grafana vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanantopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 8,069
First released20142013
ReplacesDatadogSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or ntopng better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and ntopng with Docker?

Grafana: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons