SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Backup tool nono Plakar

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS BA Backup tool nono Plakar Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneBackup tool nono Plakar
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0ISC
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 500★ 2,013
First released20202021
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…

  • Released under the ISC license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Backup tool nono Plakar details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Backup tool nono Plakar better?

Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.

Related comparisons