SHSelfHostIndex

Autorestic vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AU Autorestic Config-driven wrapper for Restic backups VS BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
FeatureAutoresticBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 1,855★ 500
First released20192020
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Autorestic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Autorestic details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Autorestic or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. Autorestic has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Autorestic and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. Autorestic is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Autorestic and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

Autorestic: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons