SHSelfHostIndex

Backrest vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backrest Web UI and orchestrator for Restic backups VS BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
FeatureBackrestBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 500
First released20242020
ReplacesBackblazeTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. Backrest has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backrest and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons