borgmatic vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureborgmaticBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 2,000★ 500
First released20132020
ReplacesCrashPlan, BackblazeTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose borgmatic if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
borgmatic details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is borgmatic or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. borgmatic has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are borgmatic and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. borgmatic is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run borgmatic and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

borgmatic: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons