Backup tool nono Plakar vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Backup tool nono Plakar | Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ISC | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,068 | ★ 500 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Time Machine, Backblaze |
What are Backup tool nono Plakar and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone?
Backup tool nono Plakar
Plakar is a modern open-source backup solution that creates encrypted, deduplicated snapshots with built-in integrity verification. It includes a web UI for browsing and restoring data.
- Encrypted deduplicated snapshots
- Integrity verification
- Web UI for restores
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
Pika Backup is a simple desktop backup application for GNOME built on BorgBackup. It focuses on protecting personal data with encrypted, deduplicated, and compressed backups.
- GNOME desktop backup app
- Encrypted Borg archives
- Simple scheduling
Backup tool nono Plakar vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: key differences
Backup tool nono Plakar is written in Go, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is built with Rust. Licensing differs — ISC for Backup tool nono Plakar versus GPL-3.0 for Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone. Backup tool nono Plakar has the considerably larger community, at 2,068 GitHub stars versus 500. Backup tool nono Plakar lists first-class Docker deployment; Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Backup tool nono Plakar or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Backup tool nono Plakar and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?
Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?
Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs Autorestic
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Autorestic
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs Backrest
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Backrest
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BackupNinja
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BackupPC
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs BackupPC
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs BorgBackup
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs BorgBackup
- Backup tool nono Plakar vs borgmatic
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs borgmatic