Autorestic vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Autorestic | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 52 · Fair | 86 · Excellent |
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,868 | ★ 2,068 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
What are Autorestic and Backup tool nono Plakar?
Autorestic
Autorestic is a higher-level wrapper around Restic that makes it easy to manage multiple backups from a single declarative configuration file. It handles backends, locations, and scheduling.
- Declarative backup config
- Multiple backends and locations
- Cron-based scheduling
Backup tool nono Plakar
Plakar is a modern open-source backup solution that creates encrypted, deduplicated snapshots with built-in integrity verification. It includes a web UI for browsing and restoring data.
- Encrypted deduplicated snapshots
- Integrity verification
- Web UI for restores
Autorestic vs Backup tool nono Plakar: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Autorestic versus ISC for Backup tool nono Plakar. Autorestic is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Backup tool nono Plakar. Autorestic is the more established project (first released 2019), while Backup tool nono Plakar arrived in 2021.
Why pick each one
Choose Autorestic if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Autorestic or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Autorestic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Autorestic and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Autorestic is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Autorestic and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Autorestic: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Autorestic or Backup tool nono Plakar?
Autorestic has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Backup tool nono Plakar. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.