BackupPC vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BackupPC
High-performance backup system for PCs and servers
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | BackupPC | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | Perl | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,621 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2001 | 2021 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan, Time Machine | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose BackupPC if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Perl
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is BackupPC or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Backup tool nono Plakar is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider BackupPC if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BackupPC and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. BackupPC is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BackupPC and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
BackupPC: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.