Autorestic vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Autorestic
Config-driven wrapper for Restic backups
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Autorestic | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,855 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Autorestic if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Autorestic or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Autorestic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Autorestic and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Autorestic is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Autorestic and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Autorestic: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.