Backrest vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Backrest
Web UI and orchestrator for Restic backups
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Backrest | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,071 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Backrest or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Backrest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Backup tool nono Plakar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Backrest and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backrest and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Backrest: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.