Dufs vs FilePizza
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dufs
Distinctive utility file server with WebDAV support
VS
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
| Feature | Dufs | FilePizza |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,562 | ★ 10,129 |
| First released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Dufs if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dufs or FilePizza better?
Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dufs and FilePizza free and open-source?
Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FilePizza under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dufs and FilePizza with Docker?
Dufs: yes. FilePizza: check the project docs for container support.