File Browser vs FilePizza

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserFilePizza
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 10,129
First released20172023
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or FilePizza better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and FilePizza free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FilePizza under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and FilePizza with Docker?

File Browser: yes. FilePizza: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons