Ceph vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 35,800
First released20062017
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ceph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Ceph and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and File Browser with Docker?

Ceph: yes. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons