Ceph vs FilePizza
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ceph
Distributed object, block, and file storage platform
VS
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
| Feature | Ceph | FilePizza |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,905 | ★ 10,129 |
| First released | 2006 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Amazon S3, Google Drive | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Ceph if…
- Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Ceph or FilePizza better?
Neither is universally better. Ceph has the larger community, while FilePizza is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ceph and FilePizza free and open-source?
Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and FilePizza under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ceph and FilePizza with Docker?
Ceph: yes. FilePizza: check the project docs for container support.