SHSelfHostIndex

Double Take vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DO Double Take Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
FeatureDouble TakeMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,435★ 19,747
First released20212019
ReplacesNest CamWowza

Why pick each one

Choose Double Take if…

  • Coordinates several detectors
  • Good Frigate companion
Double Take details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is Double Take or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Double Take if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Double Take and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Double Take and MediaMTX with Docker?

Double Take: yes. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons