SHSelfHostIndex

WebRTC Camera vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
WE WebRTC Camera Low-latency camera streaming integration for Home Assistant VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
FeatureWebRTC CameraMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,161★ 19,747
First released20212019
ReplacesCloud camera streamingWowza

Why pick each one

Choose WebRTC Camera if…

  • Very low latency
  • Local and private
WebRTC Camera details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is WebRTC Camera or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider WebRTC Camera if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are WebRTC Camera and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. WebRTC Camera is licensed under MIT and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run WebRTC Camera and MediaMTX with Docker?

WebRTC Camera: check the project docs for container support. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons