Cameradar vs MediaMTX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cameradar
RTSP stream discovery and access-auditing tool for cameras
VS
MediaMTX
Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
| Feature | Cameradar | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,147 | ★ 19,747 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Commercial camera audit tools | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cameradar or MediaMTX better?
MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cameradar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cameradar and MediaMTX free and open-source?
Yes. Cameradar is licensed under MIT and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cameradar and MediaMTX with Docker?
Cameradar: yes. MediaMTX: yes.