SHSelfHostIndex

Camera.UI vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CA Camera.UI Web interface and NVR for RTSP and camera streams VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
FeatureCamera.UIMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,083★ 19,747
First released20212019
ReplacesNest CamWowza

Why pick each one

Choose Camera.UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Camera.UI details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is Camera.UI or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Camera.UI if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Camera.UI and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. Camera.UI is licensed under MIT and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Camera.UI and MediaMTX with Docker?

Camera.UI: yes. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons