SHSelfHostIndex

CompreFace vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO CompreFace Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
FeatureCompreFaceMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 8,173★ 19,747
First released20202019
ReplacesAmazon RekognitionWowza

Why pick each one

Choose CompreFace if…

  • Easy to integrate
  • Good accuracy
CompreFace details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is CompreFace or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CompreFace if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CompreFace and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CompreFace and MediaMTX with Docker?

CompreFace: yes. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons