camera-streamer vs MediaMTX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
camera-streamer
High-performance camera streaming for Raspberry Pi
VS
MediaMTX
Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
| Feature | camera-streamer | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 442 | ★ 19,747 |
| First released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Replaces | mjpg-streamer | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Choose camera-streamer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is camera-streamer or MediaMTX better?
MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider camera-streamer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are camera-streamer and MediaMTX free and open-source?
Yes. camera-streamer is licensed under MIT and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run camera-streamer and MediaMTX with Docker?
camera-streamer: yes. MediaMTX: yes.