camera-streamer vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
camera-streamer
High-performance camera streaming for Raspberry Pi
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | camera-streamer | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 442 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2022 | 2013 |
| Replaces | mjpg-streamer | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose camera-streamer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is camera-streamer or motionEye better?
motionEye is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider camera-streamer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are camera-streamer and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. camera-streamer is licensed under MIT and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run camera-streamer and motionEye with Docker?
camera-streamer: yes. motionEye: yes.